Friday, May 27, 2016

May 27 and 31- Closing Argument

We listened from 206-244. Then we did a worksheet for the lawyers' closing arguments.

O’Brien’s Closing Argument

The most important testimony is _____________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

The state doesn’t even suggest that he was in the store during the robbery. It doesn’t suggest it was his gun that was used.  The state does contend

________________________________________________________________________

At no time does the state establish ____________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

The State tells us that it was “understood” that Steve was to check out the drugstore. But there are two problems with that.

1.  _____________________________________________________________________

2.  _____________________________________________________________________

Remember Evan‘s testimony that they stopped for a “quick bite?”  Let me tell you how this testimony clears Steve’s name.

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Briggs has already suggested that the major reason for the testimonies of Mr. Evans

and Osvaldo Cruz was ____________________________________________________.

But let’s look at the reliability of Mr. Evan’s testimony.  He is a ___________________,

_____________________ man who doesn’t think about very much of anything.

Finally, let us come to the character of Steve Harmon.  Compare Steve to Mr. Zinzi

Zinzi testified to _________________________________________________________.

It is up to you, the jury, ____________________________________________________.

It is also up to you to ______________________________________________________.

Petrocelli’s closing arguments

Let’s refocus this case.  It’s not about the character of ______________________

______________________    _________________________   _____________________.

The defense says that the witnesses testified only because _________________________
 
_______________________________________________________________________.

Even though Lorelle Henry is uneasy _________________________________________,

She still had the courage to _________________________________________________.

What would have happened if Mr. Harmon had come out of that store and gone over to Mr. King and said, “There’s someone in the store”?

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

I can imagine Harmon trying to _____________________________________________.

Mr. Harmon wants us to look at him as _______________________________________.


Now pretend that you are a jury member, deliberating on the guilt or innocence of Steve Harmon.  Circle your answer. 
GUILTY               INNOCENT
Now give three reasons FROM THE TRIAL why you think this.

1.  __________________________________________________________

2.  __________________________________________________________

3.  __________________________________________________________

Now give two reasons that support your answer that the jury does NOT know about (from a flashback or Steve’s journals).

1.  __________________________________________________________


2.  __________________________________________________________

No comments:

Post a Comment